Garden International School Rayong
Fees, boarding and campus-specific IB evidence.
Garden Rayong is an all-through British and IB school in Ban Chang; BEST is a Thai-English Programme school in Nongprue through Secondary 6. The budget gap is large, but the more important decision is the child’s language, credential and daily-school route.
// Jump to → GIS Rayong editorial ↗ · BEST editorial ↗ · Rugby vs Regents ↗ · Garden vs Regents ↗ · Regents vs Garden ↗ · MIS vs TPIS ↗
// In this guide → GIS Rayong editorial ↗ · BEST editorial ↗ · Rugby vs Regents ↗ · Garden vs Regents ↗ · Regents vs Garden ↗ · MIS vs TPIS ↗ · British schools hub ↗ · IB Diploma hub ↗
| Dimension | Garden International School Rayong | Burapa English-Programme School of Thailand (BEST) |
|---|---|---|
| Location | Ban Chang, Rayong | Nongprue, Banglamung |
| Published age span | 2–18; Nursery through Year 13 | Kindergarten 1 through Secondary 6 |
| Curriculum route | British curriculum, IGCSE and IB Diploma | Thai-English bilingual English Programme; Thai Ministry of Education route |
| Published tuition | 2025/26 annualised range: ฿147,000–฿609,800 | Undated annualised range: ฿47,000–฿166,000 |
| Primary tuition | Years 1–2: ฿418,500; Years 3–6: ฿447,300 | Primary 1–3: ฿72,000; Primary 4–6: ฿84,000 |
| Secondary tuition | Years 7–9: ฿496,800; Years 10–11: around ฿500,000; Year 12–13 IBDP: ฿609,800 | Secondary 1–3: ฿133,000; Secondary 4–6: ฿166,000 |
| Entry charges | Application ฿5,000; enrolment ฿60,000–฿120,000; refundable deposit ฿40,000 | Combined application, registration and insurance: ฿17,570 kindergarten; ฿22,070 primary; ฿32,365 secondary |
| Boarding | Weekly or full boarding from Year 5, separately priced | No boarding published |
| Full editorial | Read Garden Rayong editorial | Read BEST editorial |
| Published support-cost label | Combined fee label — “Compulsory EAL/Learning Support”; amount on request in the latest published 2025/26 fee source. | No language- or learning-support tariff appears on the current primary-undated fee page. |
Neither page replaces an admissions conversation. Garden’s dated fee issue and BEST’s undated schedule mean that a family should compare current written invoices, not make a decision from a range alone. Families needing a different language route, a specialist learning-support offer or a different commute should shortlist other schools rather than forcing this pairing.
undefined
undefined
undefined
undefined
undefined
Use the decision framework above to weigh curriculum, fees, continuity, location and your child’s fit.
Garden and BEST serve families on the Eastern Seaboard, but they should not be treated as two versions of the same product. Garden’s ledger record is an English-medium international pathway from early years through Year 13, with British curriculum stages, IGCSE and an IB Diploma route. BEST is a Thai-English bilingual English Programme through Secondary 6, recorded in the official private-school database. A family that needs Thai-system continuity, Thai literacy and a bilingual school-day context may find BEST’s route more coherent even if it can afford Garden. A family seeking an international English-medium route and IB option may find that Garden answers a different brief. The admissions question is therefore not “which school costs less?” but “which leaving route, teaching language and daily environment matches this child?”
Age span changes the decision again. Both schools publish a route from young children to the end of secondary education, but their year groups and qualifications should not be casually mapped across each other. Ask each school to explain the placement process for a child arriving from the other system, including Thai-language expectations, English assessment, year placement, support, subject selection and the certificates available at graduation. A table can show a fee range; it cannot guarantee that a particular transfer will be smooth. Bring the child’s current reports and ask for a written description of the proposed placement before paying an acceptance fee.
For Garden, the international pathway includes a senior decision point. Its record supports an IB Diploma option, but families should ask how the school guides students into senior courses, which subjects are available in the intended cohort and what support applies to a student joining late. For BEST, ask how its Thai-English Programme balances both languages at the child’s stage, which examination and university routes families typically discuss, and how it supports a learner moving from an English-only or international curriculum. Neither answer should be assumed from a school label.
Garden’s latest published tariff in the ledger is for 2025/26, even though the school publishes a 2026/27 calendar. The fee range is therefore a useful planning reference, not a promise of the next invoice. Request the applicable 2026/27 year-group tuition, payment schedule, application charge, enrolment charge and deposit terms. Garden also publishes separately priced boarding, transport, visa documents and other items that can materially change a household budget. A family comparing a Year 7 child should not compare a Garden 2025/26 annualised tuition line with a BEST image and assume that all other costs are equal.
BEST’s live fee image has the opposite caution: it gives stage-by-stage two-semester amounts but does not state the academic year. Its annualised figures are low relative to Garden’s international tariff, yet the missing year means admissions must confirm currency in writing. The schedule identifies combined application, registration and insurance amounts, while bus, food, uniforms, books, activities and examinations either have no current price or need separate clarification. Ask whether a child’s quoted fee includes every compulsory activity and whether any support, special programme or exam entry is an extra. Unknown is not the same as included.
A practical budget worksheet has the same columns for both schools: tuition, entry charges, refundable deposit, food, transport, books, uniforms, trips, clubs, exams, learning support, boarding where relevant, and the timing of every payment. Mark each entry published, quoted or unknown. Then compare the same child, the same school year and the same payment basis. This prevents an attractive headline figure from becoming an inaccurate first-year budget.
Ban Chang and Nongprue create different family routines. Test the actual school-day journey at drop-off and collection times, not a quiet map route. Ask whether the home address is served by transport, whether a route price changes with distance, what happens after activities, and who supervises a child waiting for collection. Garden’s published boarding option can change the weekly calculation for some families, but it should be inspected as it exists now: availability, house rules, medical arrangements, weekend routine, transport between the accommodation and school, and every separate fee. BEST does not publish boarding, so its commute must work every school day.
On a visit, look beyond the facilities. Ask to see the relevant year group, not only a showcase classroom. Ask how a new child is assessed, how parents receive progress information, who coordinates language or learning support, and which costs appear after enrolment. A strong fit is one that can be explained in ordinary terms: the child understands the classroom language, the curriculum leads where the family expects, the daily journey is sustainable, and the written invoice is affordable. If any one of those remains unclear, the right next step is another question, not a rushed deposit.
Use the same questions with both admissions teams. Is there a place in the exact year group? What is the child’s proposed placement and why? Which language support is included, assessed or charged separately? Which fees are compulsory before the first day, which are refundable and which can change during the year? What does the transport route look like for the home address? Which books, uniforms, devices, activities and examinations are required? Who is the daily contact if the child is struggling? A written answer is more useful than a brochure because it connects the school’s general offer to one child’s actual start date.
For a family arriving from overseas, ask the further questions early: visa-document costs, start-date flexibility, records required for placement, Thai-language expectations, medical documentation and whether the child can join after the normal term begins. For a family already in Thailand, ask how the school handles a curriculum change and whether the child can observe a lesson or meet the proposed year team. These are not administrative details. They determine whether a low headline price becomes a workable transition or whether a more expensive all-through route brings practical value.
Finally, keep the evidence. Save the dated fee PDFs, screenshots, email quotes and admissions terms next to the family budget. Garden’s published tariff and BEST’s undated image are useful public starting points, but they are not a substitute for a current offer. The school that fits is the one whose pathway, language, commute, support and written cost all work together for the child.
Do not assume that Garden’s international label makes every later option automatic, or that BEST’s bilingual label makes it the same as an English-medium international programme. Do not assume a published fee includes food, transport, examinations or support without the current invoice. Do not assume a higher or lower tuition amount measures teaching quality. It measures a published price under a particular fee year and set of terms. The relevant comparison is between two real offers for the same child.
Parents can also avoid a common transfer mistake by discussing the destination before enrolling. Ask what the next stage looks like after the intended leaving year, how records are issued, which language of instruction is used for key subjects and what support a student receives when changing system. A plan that works at admission should also make sense two or five years later.
Keep the final quote, payment terms and enrolment correspondence with the child’s school records.
29 schools verified. Twenty-nine full editorials live. Maintained, not abandoned.